Thanks Michael, I confirm that I now see what I was expecting. Sorry for the rookie mistake. I *really* need to get to your class... Geoff I only said that because I didn't think I was... :-P -----Original Message----- From: vol-users-bounces(a)volatilityfoundation.org [mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilesystems.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ligh Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 9:00 AM To: vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Vol-users] Output of strings not found in memdump output - QEMU/QEVM sample -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Geoff, The key to get strings working is to make sure you have a raw memory dump. lqs2mem *should* give you that, however I've not personally used it before. One discrepancy I see with your logic is regarding this line: memory_dump.ram.vol.strings:183190042 [3156:0189321a] <Search_String> It tells you the search string is at virtual address 0189321a in pid 3156. You then dumped the *executable* for pid 3156 which gives you memory from the base of the exe 400000 to its base + size (nowhere near 0189321a). Try using the memdump or vaddump plugins on 3156 instead. That will give you ALL of the process's addressable memory, not just the range that contains the exe. MHL On 5/7/15 3:03 PM, Torres, Geoff (Cyber Security) wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the 'me too' response, but I'm having this exact same > problem. However, the main difference is that I'm using a 'QEMU' > memory image (Hex dump sig is QEVM in the first 4 bytes) from a cloud > instance. > > I've converted these in the past using the 'lqs2mem' tool written by > Juerg Haefliger and Andrew Tappert and it's worked perfectly for the > 'netscan' and 'ps' type plugins. However, I haven't needed to dump > processes before and look for specific strings. I can locate the > strings in the converted image, but it's not translating to the > processes that are identified by the 'strings' plugin. > > > Here's the steps I've been taking - > > ## Memory dump info >> ll memory_dump > -rw------- 1 geoff citsirt 7579914273 Apr 27 13:36 memory_dump > >> file memory_dump > memory_dump: QEMU suspend to disk image > >> xxd memory_dump | head -n1 > 0000000: 5145 564d 0000 0003 0100 0000 0105 626c QEVM..........bl > > > ## Convert the dump >> lqs2mem -w pc.ram memory_dump memory_dump.ram > section = pc.ram size = 8192 [MB] > 8589934592 [bytes] section = pc.bios size > = 128 [KB] 131072 [bytes] section = pc.rom > size = 128 [KB] 131072 [bytes] section = vga.vram > size = 16 [MB] 16777216 [bytes] section = > 0000:00:02.0/cirrus_vga.rom size = 64 [KB] 65536 > [bytes] Wrote 8589934592 bytes from section 'pc.ram' to file > memory_dump.ram > > > ## Create the strings file >> strings -a -t d memory_dump.ram > memory_dump.ram.strings > >> strings -a -t d -el memory_dump.ram >> memory_dump.ram.strings > > > ## Create the volatility strings file >> python /data/download/apps/forensic_tools/volatility/vol.py -f >> memory_dump.ram --profile=Win2008SP2x64 strings -s >> --output-file=memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > > >> ll memory_dump.ram.strings memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > -rw-rw-r-- 1 geoff citsirt 2914258187 May 7 08:58 > memory_dump.ram.strings -rw-rw-r-- 1 geoff citsirt 4292775089 May > 7 12:17 memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > > > ## '<Search_String>' is found in both string files as expected >> fgrep <Search_String> memory_dump.ram.strings >> memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > memory_dump.ram.strings:183190042 <Search_String> > memory_dump.ram.vol.strings:183190042 [3156:0189321a] <Search_String> > > > ## Dump process 3156 as identified by volatility >> python /data/download/apps/forensic_tools/volatility/vol.py -f >> memory_dump.ram --profile=Win2008SP2x64 procdump -p 3156 -D >> processes -m > Volatility Foundation Volatility Framework 2.4 Process(V) > ImageBase Name Result ------------------ > ------------------ -------------------- ------ 0xfffffa800a4e6370 > 0x0000000000400000 iwproxy.exe OK: executable.3156.exe > >> ll processes/executable.3156.exe > -rw-rw-r-- 1 geoff citsirt 3248128 May 7 12:35 > processes/executable.3156.exe > > > ## '<Search_String>' not found in the dumped executable >> strings -a processes/executable.3156.exe | fgrep <Search_String> >> strings -a -el processes/executable.3156.exe | fgrep >> <Search_String> > > > I've tried many different variations of the above steps and all > have the same results. > > According to what I've read in this thread is that the issue is to > make sure the original dump is properly converted. How can I do > that? 'lqs2mem' has limited options. > > Any ideas on what I can do differently to get this to work? > > Thanks, > > Geoff > > > > -----Original Message----- From: > vol-users-bounces(a)volatilityfoundation.org > [mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Ligh Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:49 AM To: Bridgey theGeek Cc: > vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Vol-users] Output of > strings not found in memdump output > > Perfect! Glad to hear all is good in the world ;-) > > MHL > > On 3/24/15 5:05 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: >> Awesome, thanks Michael. > >> I generated a raw dump as follows, with the vmsn and vmem files >> in the same folder: $ python vol.py -f winxp.vmem >> --profile=WinXPSP2x86 imagecopy -O winxp.raw > >> Then ran strings again (having generated a new input text file >> because of course the offsets will be different): $ python vol.py >> -f winxp.raw --profile=WinXPSP2x86 strings -s pk.txt > >> I was then able to find the banner at the offsets reported by >> strings. And all was good in the world. > >> Thank you very much for the support. > >> Adam > >> On 23 March 2015 at 19:39, Michael Ligh &lt;michael.ligh(a)mnin.org >> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org>> wrote: > >> Hey Adam, > >> A few things: > >> * Yes, vmss2core creates a windows crash dump * You can use >> volatility on the original vmem/vmss by doing the following: > >> * make sure both vmem and vmss files are in the same dir * make >> sure they have the same base name (i.e. test.vmem and test.vmss) >> * run your volatility plugins against the vmem > >> In this case, it would also be required to generate a raw memory >> dump before running strings. So you would use imagecopy on the >> vmem. > >> LMK if that helps! Michael > >> On 3/23/15 10:51 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: >>> Hi Michael, > >>> *sigh* When will I learn to check the origin of my samples?! > >>> The guy who provided me with the sample tells me that he took a >>> snapshot of a VMWare machine and then used vss2core to convert >>> it. I BELIEVE that makes it into a Windows Memory Core Dump..? > >>> I got hold of the original vmem and vmsn files. Trying to use >>> imagecopy on the vmsn just replicated the input file. I think >>> the header is not what Volatility would expect: $ xxd Windows\ >>> XP\ Pro\ SP2\ \(32-bit\)-Snapshot49.vmsn |head 0000000: d2be >>> d2be 0800 0000 6300 0000 4368 6563 ........c...Chec 0000010: >>> 6b70 6f69 6e74 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 kpoint.......... >>> 0000020: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 >>> ................ 0000030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 >>> 0000 ................ 0000040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 >>> fc1e 0000 ................ 0000050: 0000 0000 ab03 0000 0000 >>> 0000 4775 6573 ............Gues 0000060: 7456 6172 7300 0000 >>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 tVars........... 0000070: 0000 0000 0000 >>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 0000080: 0000 0000 >>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 0000090: 0000 >>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 a722 0000 .............".. > >>> Does that mean I can't use this with Volatility? > >>> Thank you, Adam > >>> On 23 March 2015 at 14:57, Michael Ligh &lt;michael.ligh(a)mnin.org >>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org >>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org>>> wrote: > >>> Hey Adam, > >>> We forgot to ask if the sample was a raw memory dump. For >>> example: > >>> $ xxd ~/Desktop/memory.dmp | less > >>> 0000000: 5041 4745 4455 4d50 0f00 0000 280a 0000 >>> PAGEDUMP....(... 0000010: 8001 6c07 00c0 e680 a031 5580 5892 >>> 5580 ..l......1U.X.U. 0000020: 4c01 0000 0100 0000 8000 0000 >>> 5444 4f00 L...........TDO. 0000030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 >>> 0000 5041 4745 ............PAGE 0000040: 5041 4745 5041 4745 >>> 5041 4745 5041 4745 PAGEPAGEPAGEPAGE > >>> If its something like a crash dump, hibernation, etc then the >>> file format headers throw off the offsets. You can convert >>> those special file types into a raw memory dump with the >>> imagecopy plugin and then your strings translations should be >>> accurate. > >>> Cheers! MHL > >>> On 3/23/15 8:54 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: >>>> Hi Andrew, > >>>> I was certain I was running the latest version, but just to >>>> be sure I grabbed the latest version. Same result, same >>>> offsets. > >>>> I can make the sample available, but more than happy to do >>>> whatever debugging needs doing (if I can!) > >>>> Adam > >>>> On 23 March 2015 at 13:03, Andrew Case &lt;atcuno(a)gmail.com >>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> >> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>>>> wrote: > >>>> Are you using the latest git checkout of Volatility or the >>>> 2.4 release? Can you try the latest checkout and re-run >>>> Volatility strings (you can run it on just the offsets from >>>> PID 123 to make it faster). > >>>> If you are already on the latest checkout then we will need >>>> to debug further. > > > > >>>> Thanks, Andrew (@attrc) > >>>> On 03/23/2015 04:38 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: >>>>> Thanks Andrew: >>>>> >>>>> python vol.py --profile=WinXPSP2x86 -f memory.dmp volshell >>>>> -p 123 Volatility Foundation Volatility Framework 2.4 >>>>> Current context: myapp.exe @ 0x822042f8, pid=123, ppid=392 >>>> DTB=0x76c0040 >>>>> Welcome to volshell! Current memory image is: >>>>> file:///home/memory.dmp To get help, type 'hh()' >>>>>>>> db(0x75b6b4d8) >>>>> 0x75b6b4d8 c3 7c 15 c7 85 00 ff ff ff 01 00 00 00 75 09 8d >>>>> .|...........u.. 0x75b6b4e8 85 0c ff ff ff 50 ff 17 39 >>>>> 9d 00 ff ff ff 89 85 .....P..9....... 0x75b6b4f8 30 ff ff >>>>> ff 74 12 6a 0c 8d 85 c4 fe ff ff 50 6a 0...t.j.......Pj >>>>> 0x75b6b508 07 6a fe e8 ea 92 ff ff 83 bd 28 ff ff ff 0c 0f >>>>> .j........(..... 0x75b6b518 84 8c 59 00 00 e9 18 ff ff ff >>>>> 90 90 47 00 6c 00 ..Y.........G.l. 0x75b6b528 6f 00 62 00 >>>>> 61 00 6c 00 5c 00 54 00 65 00 72 00 o.b.a.l.\.T.e.r. >>>>> 0x75b6b538 6d 00 53 00 72 00 76 00 52 00 65 00 61 00 64 00 >>>>> m.S.r.v.R.e.a.d. 0x75b6b548 79 00 45 00 76 00 65 00 6e 00 >>>>> 74 00 00 00 90 90 y.E.v.e.n.t..... >>>>> >>>>> Nope, still no banner. But it is identical to what I find >>>>> at >>>> 0x1a34d8 in >>>>> 123.dmp. (As you'd expect.) Double-checked that I was >>>>> searching Unicode and ASCII - still no luck. >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm. >>>>> >>>>> Adam >>>>> >>>>> On 23 March 2015 at 04:02, Andrew Case &lt;atcuno(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> >>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>>> >>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> >>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Can do you: >>>>> >>>>> vol.py ... volshell -p 123 >>>>> >>>>> Then in volshell do: >>>>> >>>>> db(0x75b6b4d8) >>>>> >>>>> And see if you get the banner printed at the beginning? >>>>> >>>>> Also, how are you searching 123.dmp? Did you search ascii >>>>> & >>>> unicode >>>>> (most common error) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, Andrew (@attrc) >>>>> >>>>> On 03/20/2015 03:59 PM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I can't quite see what's wrong with my logic here, but I >>>>>> must be >>>>> missing >>>>>> something. Hoping someone can help me out. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm looking for a private key in a memory sample >>>>>> (WinXPSP2x86). Specifically, to find out which process/es >>>>>> is/are accessing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can find the key by searching the raw memory dump >>>> (memory.dmp). >>>>>> As you might expect it's between: -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE >>>>>> KEY----- -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY----- >>>>>> >>>>>> I generated an offset:string file by using strings. Then, >>>>>> using the strings plugin I get this output: $ python >>>>>> vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=WinXPSP2x86 strings >>>> -s pk.txt >>>>>> Volatility Foundation Volatility Framework 2.4 188435934 >>>>>> [FREE MEMORY:-1] -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- >>>>>> 188435968 [FREE MEMORY:-1] -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY----- >>>>>> 317375704 [kernel:d2ab24d8] -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE >>>>>> KEY----- 317376575 [kernel:d2ab283f] -----END RSA PRIVATE >>>>>> KEY----- 417203416 [123:75b6b4d8] -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE >>>>>> KEY----- 417204287 [123:75b6b83f] -----END RSA PRIVATE >>>>>> KEY----- 419888606 [FREE MEMORY:-1] -----BEGIN RSA >>>>>> PRIVATE KEY----- 419888640 [FREE MEMORY:-1] -----END RSA >>>>>> PRIVATE KEY----- >>>>>> >>>>>> Lovely. So I now do a memdump of process 123: $ python >>>>>> vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=WinXPSP2x86 memdump >>>> --pid=123 >>>>>> --dump-dir=123 Volatility Foundation Volatility >>>>>> Framework 2.4 >>>>>> >>>>> > > >> ********************************************************************* * ** _______________________________________________ Vol-users mailing list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users

Hey Greg, A couple thoughts/ideas: What was the initial reason for investigation- the suspect EXE? Do you have a timeframe of the suspect activity? What was the context around the suspect EXE download, just the PCAP or? If so, did the memory capture occur when there was still an active connection? Sometimes this can be a dealbreaker when the connection isn't there. Does moddump work on the module with that base address? If so, what type of strings are you seeing? As far as execution goes, does the shimcache plugin provide any results around the time of interest? Assuming you have a time of interest, you could also try the timeliner plugin to pull in other temporal artifacts to hone in around that suspect time. hope this helps, Jared - @jared703 On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Gregory Pendergast < greg.pendergast(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

Just as a follow up to my last reply, the shimcache plugin reported that there was no shimcache data, and the timeliner plugin didn't reveal anything apparently interesting except IE history related to the download. Thanks, Greg On May 14, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jared Greenhill &lt;jared703(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Hey Greg, A couple thoughts/ideas: What was the initial reason for investigation- the suspect EXE? Do you have a timeframe of the suspect activity? What was the context around the suspect EXE download, just the PCAP or? If so, did the memory capture occur when there was still an active connection? Sometimes this can be a dealbreaker when the connection isn't there. Does moddump work on the module with that base address? If so, what type of strings are you seeing? As far as execution goes, does the shimcache plugin provide any results around the time of interest? Assuming you have a time of interest, you could also try the timeliner plugin to pull in other temporal artifacts to hone in around that suspect time. hope this helps, Jared - @jared703 On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Gregory Pendergast < greg.pendergast(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

Thanks Michael. Regarding the latter part of inspecting the data around the strings, that's where I really need the help. I know I can accomplish that with volshell, but I'm not proficient enough yet to know how to get at it. If you could provide the necessary commands to get at the data around this hit [kernel:f9805ba44800] as an example, that would be most helpful. I'm sure I was doing something n00bishly wrong, but I could never get to the point of displaying the data around that location. I'd be more specific about my attempts, but I'm not in front of my analysis machine right now and don't recall exactly what I tried. thanks, greg

Thanks Michael. I did try that, and received an error. That's why I thought I must be doing/forgetting something stupid. Now that I'm back at my analysis machine, here's the output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> NameError: name 'f9805ba44800' is not defined <volatility.plugins.addrspaces.amd64.AMD64PagedMemory object at 0xbef520c> Note that I'm using Volatilty through the VM provided for the most recent class in Reston, in case the version is in question. The profile for this sample is WIn7SP1x64. Thanks, Greg On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Michael Ligh &lt;michael.ligh(a)mnin.org&gt; wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > You would just type db(0xf9805ba44800) in volshell (or whatever other > address you want to see). > > https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility/wiki/Command%20Refere > nce#volshell > <https://github.com/volatilityfoundation/volatility/wiki/Command%20Reference#volshell> > > I would also search an electronic copy of the AMF book for "volshell" > - - there are lots of examples. > > > On 5/14/15 10:52 PM, Gregory Pendergast wrote: > > Thanks Michael. Regarding the latter part of inspecting the data > > around the strings, that's where I really need the help. I know I > > can accomplish that with volshell, but I'm not proficient enough > > yet to know how to get at it. > > > > If you could provide the necessary commands to get at the data > > around this hit [kernel:f9805ba44800] as an example, that would be > > most helpful. > > > > I'm sure I was doing something n00bishly wrong, but I could never > > get to the point of displaying the data around that location. I'd > > be more specific about my attempts, but I'm not in front of my > > analysis machine right now and don't recall exactly what I tried. > > > > thanks, greg > > > >> On May 14, 2015, at 9:39 PM, Michael Ligh &lt;michael.ligh(a)mnin.org&gt; > >> wrote: > >> > > I wouldn't think the module at 0x48706657040b0003 requires > > investigation. Not only bc its not in the 0xfffff8 range, but you > > might notice legitimate modules are typically loaded at page > > aligned base addresses (not XXX0003). Your result looks like a > > false positive and given the way modscan works (pool scanning) its > > probably a partially overwritten structure in free/deallocated > > memory. We *could* put a sanity check in the code to suppress > > entries that aren't loaded at page aligned addresses, but there are > > a few exceptions where you'll have modules loaded from non-page > > aligned addresses. For example, we just looked at a rootkit today > > in class that is loaded at 0x81b91b80 (on a 32-bit system). Jared's > > advice is also good - if you ever suspect something like this > > again, you can use volshell to display the data at the alleged base > > address and see what's there. If its not an MZ signature, then its > > probably not a currently loaded module (but keep in mind you can > > overwrite the MZ with 00 or anything else as a trick...but in that > > case you'll see real executable code not too far away). > > > > I would suggest trying to figure out what downloaded the EXE in > > the first place, so that you can determine what it does after the > > download finishes (drop to disk and run, drop to disk and run then > > delete, load directly into memory without touching disk, etc). I > > would also inspect the data around the strings you found in kernel > > and free memory - is it verbatim with what you see in the pcap > > (i.e. just a copy of the packet) or has it been altered (i.e. > > unpacked, executed, expanded). > > > >>>> On 5/14/15 4:31 PM, Gregory Pendergast wrote: Just as a > >>>> follow up to my last reply, the shimcache plugin reported > >>>> that there was no shimcache data, and the timeliner plugin > >>>> didn't reveal anything apparently interesting except IE > >>>> history related to the download. > >> >>>> Thanks, Greg > >> >> >>>> On May 14, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jared Greenhill > >>>> &lt;jared703(a)gmail.com <mailto:jared703@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >>>>> Hey Greg, > >>> >>>>> A couple thoughts/ideas: > >>> >>>>> What was the initial reason for investigation- the suspect > >>>>> EXE? Do you have a timeframe of the suspect activity? > >>> >>>>> What was the context around the suspect EXE download, just > >>>>> the PCAP or? If so, did the memory capture occur when there > >>>>> was still an active connection? Sometimes this can be a > >>>>> dealbreaker when the connection isn't there. > >>> >>>>> Does moddump work on the module with that base address? If > >>>>> so, what type of strings are you seeing? > >>> >>>>> As far as execution goes, does the shimcache plugin provide > >>>>> any results around the time of interest? Assuming you have > >>>>> a time of interest, you could also try the timeliner plugin > >>>>> to pull in other temporal artifacts to hone in around that > >>>>> suspect time. > >>> >>>>> hope this helps, Jared - @jared703 > >>> >>> >>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Gregory Pendergast > >>>>> &lt;greg.pendergast(a)gmail.com > >>>>> <mailto:greg.pendergast@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> >>>>> Greeting, > >>> >>>>> I'm examining a memory sample (captured locally with > >>>>> winpmem_1.6.2) <yeah...i know...> > >>> >>>>> Modscan shows one apparently strange module that has no > >>>>> name and no file listed. The base address space also seems > >>>>> way out of whack for the rest of the sample. > >>> >>>>> So all i have are offset, base, and size: > >>>>> 0x000000023a80b540 0x48706657040b0003 0xf3a54f0 > >>> >>>>> In particular, that base address seems way out of range > >>>>> compared to everything else in 0xfffff8.... space > >>> >>>>> How can I tell if this is an error of some kind in the > >>>>> captured sample versus a legitimate anomaly that bears > >>>>> investigation? > >>> >>> >>>>> Lastly, and pardon me if this is a n00b question, but how > >>>>> can I determine why specific strings appear in kernel > >>>>> memory (based on strings plugin output)? For context, I > >>>>> have a suspicious executable download, but there appears to > >>>>> be no evidence of the file in $MFT (I don't have access to > >>>>> UsnJrnl) and I'm trying to find out what happened to it and > >>>>> whether it ran. Strings from the executable (ontained from > >>>>> pcap) do appear in Free Memory and Kernel memory, but I'm > >>>>> not clear whether that's a symptom of the download or a > >>>>> sign of execution. > >>> >>>>> Thanks, greg > >>> >>> >>>>>>> On May 11, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Torres, Geoff (Cyber > >>>>>>> Security) > >>>>>> &lt;geoff.torres(a)hp.com <mailto:geoff.torres@hp.com>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>> Thanks Michael, > >>>> >>>>>> I confirm that I now see what I was expecting. Sorry for > >>>>>> the > >>>>> rookie mistake. > >>>> >>>>>> I *really* need to get to your class... > >>>> >>>>>> Geoff > >>>> >>>>>>> Don't be afraid to tell me I'm doing something > >>>>>>> stupid... :-) > >>>> >>>>>> I only said that because I didn't think I was... :-P > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: > >>>>>> vol-users-bounces(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>> <mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>> [mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>> <mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org>] On Behalf > >>>>> Of Michael Ligh > >>>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 9:00 AM To: > >>>>>> vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>> <mailto:vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vol-users] Output of strings not found in > >>>>>> memdump > >>>>> output - QEMU/QEVM sample > >>>> Hi Geoff, > >> >>>> The key to get strings working is to make sure you have a > >>>> raw > >>>>>> memory dump. lqs2mem *should* give you that, however I've > >>>>>> not personally used it before. > >> >>>> One discrepancy I see with your logic is regarding this > >>>> line: > >> >>>> memory_dump.ram.vol.strings:183190042 [3156:0189321a] > >>>>>> <Search_String> > >> >>>> It tells you the search string is at virtual address 0189321a > >>>> in > >>>>>> pid 3156. You then dumped the *executable* for pid 3156 > >>>>>> which gives you memory from the base of the exe 400000 to > >>>>>> its base + size (nowhere near 0189321a). > >> >>>> Try using the memdump or vaddump plugins on 3156 instead. > >>>> That > >>>>>> will give you ALL of the process's addressable memory, > >>>>>> not just the range that contains the exe. > >> >>>> MHL > >> >>>>>>>> On 5/7/15 3:03 PM, Torres, Geoff (Cyber Security) > >>>>>>>> wrote: Hi, > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry for the 'me too' response, but I'm having this > >>>>>>>> exact same problem. However, the main difference is > >>>>>>>> that I'm using a 'QEMU' memory image (Hex dump sig is > >>>>>>>> QEVM in the first 4 bytes) from a > >>>>>> cloud > >>>>>>>> instance. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've converted these in the past using the 'lqs2mem' > >>>>>>>> tool > >>>>>> written by > >>>>>>>> Juerg Haefliger and Andrew Tappert and it's worked > >>>>>>>> perfectly > >>>>>> for the > >>>>>>>> 'netscan' and 'ps' type plugins. However, I haven't > >>>>>>>> needed to dump processes before and look for specific > >>>>>>>> strings. I can locate the strings in the converted > >>>>>>>> image, but it's not translating to the processes that > >>>>>>>> are identified by the 'strings' plugin. > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's the steps I've been taking - > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## Memory dump info > >>>>>>>>> ll memory_dump > >>>>>>>> -rw------- 1 geoff citsirt 7579914273 Apr 27 13:36 > >>>>>>>> memory_dump > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> file memory_dump > >>>>>>>> memory_dump: QEMU suspend to disk image > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> xxd memory_dump | head -n1 > >>>>>>>> 0000000: 5145 564d 0000 0003 0100 0000 0105 626c > >>>>>>>> QEVM..........bl > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## Convert the dump > >>>>>>>>> lqs2mem -w pc.ram memory_dump memory_dump.ram > >>>>>>>> section = pc.ram size = > >>>>>>>> 8192 [MB] 8589934592 [bytes] section = pc.bios size = > >>>>>>>> 128 [KB] 131072 [bytes] section = pc.rom size = > >>>>>>>> 128 [KB] 131072 [bytes] section = vga.vram size > >>>>>>>> = 16 [MB] 16777216 [bytes] section = > >>>>>>>> 0000:00:02.0/cirrus_vga.rom size = 64 [KB] > >>>>>>>> 65536 [bytes] Wrote 8589934592 bytes from section > >>>>>>>> 'pc.ram' to file memory_dump.ram > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## Create the strings file > >>>>>>>>> strings -a -t d memory_dump.ram > > >>>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.strings > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> strings -a -t d -el memory_dump.ram >> > >>>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.strings > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## Create the volatility strings file > >>>>>>>>> python > >>>>>>>>> /data/download/apps/forensic_tools/volatility/vol.py > >>>>>>>>> -f memory_dump.ram --profile=Win2008SP2x64 strings > >>>>>>>>> -s --output-file=memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ll memory_dump.ram.strings > >>>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > >>>>>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 geoff citsirt 2914258187 May 7 08:58 > >>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.strings -rw-rw-r-- 1 geoff citsirt > >>>>>>>> 4292775089 May 7 12:17 memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## '<Search_String>' is found in both string files > >>>>>>>> as expected > >>>>>>>>> fgrep <Search_String> memory_dump.ram.strings > >>>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.vol.strings > >>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.strings:183190042 <Search_String> > >>>>>>>> memory_dump.ram.vol.strings:183190042 > >>>>>>>> [3156:0189321a] > >>>>>> <Search_String> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## Dump process 3156 as identified by volatility > >>>>>>>>> python > >>>>>>>>> /data/download/apps/forensic_tools/volatility/vol.py > >>>>>>>>> -f memory_dump.ram --profile=Win2008SP2x64 procdump > >>>>>>>>> -p 3156 -D processes -m > >>>>>>>> Volatility Foundation Volatility Framework 2.4 > >>>>>>>> Process(V) ImageBase Name > >>>>>>>> Result ------------------ ------------------ > >>>>>>>> -------------------- ------ 0xfffffa800a4e6370 > >>>>>>>> 0x0000000000400000 iwproxy.exe OK: > >>>>>>>> executable.3156.exe > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ll processes/executable.3156.exe > >>>>>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 geoff citsirt 3248128 May 7 12:35 > >>>>>>>> processes/executable.3156.exe > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ## '<Search_String>' not found in the dumped > >>>>>>>> executable > >>>>>>>>> strings -a processes/executable.3156.exe | fgrep > >>>>>>>>> <Search_String> strings -a -el > >>>>>>>>> processes/executable.3156.exe | fgrep > >>>>>>>>> <Search_String> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've tried many different variations of the above > >>>>>>>> steps and all have the same results. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> According to what I've read in this thread is that > >>>>>>>> the issue is to make sure the original dump is > >>>>>>>> properly converted. How can I do that? 'lqs2mem' > >>>>>>>> has limited options. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any ideas on what I can do differently to get this > >>>>>>>> to work? > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Geoff > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't be afraid to tell me I'm doing something > >>>>>>>> stupid... :-) > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: > >>>>>>>> vol-users-bounces(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>> [mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:vol-users-bounces@volatilityfoundation.org>] On Behalf > >>>>>> Of Michael > >>>>>>>> Ligh Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:49 AM To: > >>>>>>>> Bridgey theGeek Cc: vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> Subject: Re: > >>>>>> [Vol-users] Output of > >>>>>>>> strings not found in memdump output > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Perfect! Glad to hear all is good in the world ;-) > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> MHL > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 3/24/15 5:05 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Awesome, thanks Michael. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I generated a raw dump as follows, with the vmsn > >>>>>>>>> and vmem files in the same folder: $ python vol.py > >>>>>>>>> -f winxp.vmem --profile=WinXPSP2x86 imagecopy -O > >>>>>>>>> winxp.raw > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then ran strings again (having generated a new > >>>>>>>>> input text file because of course the offsets will > >>>>>>>>> be different): $ python vol.py -f winxp.raw > >>>>>>>>> --profile=WinXPSP2x86 strings -s pk.txt > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was then able to find the banner at the offsets > >>>>>>>>> reported by strings. And all was good in the > >>>>>>>>> world. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for the support. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Adam > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23 March 2015 at 19:39, Michael Ligh > >>>>>>>>> &lt;michael.ligh(a)mnin.org > >>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org> >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Adam, > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A few things: > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * Yes, vmss2core creates a windows crash dump * You > >>>>>>>>> can use volatility on the original vmem/vmss by > >>>>>>>>> doing the following: > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * make sure both vmem and vmss files are in the > >>>>>>>>> same dir * make sure they have the same base name > >>>>>>>>> (i.e. test.vmem and test.vmss) * run your > >>>>>>>>> volatility plugins against the vmem > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In this case, it would also be required to generate > >>>>>>>>> a raw memory dump before running strings. So you > >>>>>>>>> would use imagecopy on the vmem. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LMK if that helps! Michael > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/23/15 10:51 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: Hi > >>>>>>>>>> Michael, > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *sigh* When will I learn to check the origin of > >>>>>>>>>> my samples?! > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The guy who provided me with the sample tells me > >>>>>>>>>> that he took a snapshot of a VMWare machine and > >>>>>>>>>> then used vss2core to convert it. I BELIEVE that > >>>>>>>>>> makes it into a Windows Memory Core Dump..? > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I got hold of the original vmem and vmsn files. > >>>>>>>>>> Trying to use imagecopy on the vmsn just > >>>>>>>>>> replicated the input file. I think the header is > >>>>>>>>>> not what Volatility would expect: $ xxd Windows\ > >>>>>>>>>> XP\ Pro\ SP2\ \(32-bit\)-Snapshot49.vmsn |head > >>>>>>>>>> 0000000: d2be d2be 0800 0000 6300 0000 4368 6563 > >>>>>>>>>> ........c...Chec 0000010: 6b70 6f69 6e74 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 kpoint.......... 0000020: > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> ................ 0000030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 0000040: > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fc1e 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> ................ 0000050: 0000 0000 ab03 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 4775 6573 ............Gues 0000060: > >>>>>>>>>> 7456 6172 7300 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> tVars........... 0000070: 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 0000080: > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> ................ 0000090: 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 a722 0000 .............".. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does that mean I can't use this with Volatility? > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Adam > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 23 March 2015 at 14:57, Michael Ligh > >>>>>> &lt;michael.ligh(a)mnin.org <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org>> > >>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org > >>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org > >>>>>> <mailto:michael.ligh@mnin.org>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey Adam, > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We forgot to ask if the sample was a raw memory > >>>>>>>>>> dump. For example: > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> $ xxd ~/Desktop/memory.dmp | less > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 0000000: 5041 4745 4455 4d50 0f00 0000 280a 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> PAGEDUMP....(... 0000010: 8001 6c07 00c0 e680 > >>>>>>>>>> a031 5580 5892 5580 ..l......1U.X.U. 0000020: > >>>>>>>>>> 4c01 0000 0100 0000 8000 0000 5444 4f00 > >>>>>>>>>> L...........TDO. 0000030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 > >>>>>>>>>> 0000 0000 5041 4745 ............PAGE 0000040: > >>>>>>>>>> 5041 4745 5041 4745 5041 4745 5041 4745 > >>>>>>>>>> PAGEPAGEPAGEPAGE > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If its something like a crash dump, hibernation, > >>>>>>>>>> etc then the file format headers throw off the > >>>>>>>>>> offsets. You can convert those special file types > >>>>>>>>>> into a raw memory dump with the imagecopy plugin > >>>>>>>>>> and then your strings translations should be > >>>>>>>>>> accurate. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers! MHL > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/23/15 8:54 AM, Bridgey theGeek wrote: Hi > >>>>>>>>>>> Andrew, > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I was certain I was running the latest version, > >>>>>>>>>>> but just to be sure I grabbed the latest > >>>>>>>>>>> version. Same result, same offsets. > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I can make the sample available, but more than > >>>>>>>>>>> happy to do whatever debugging needs doing (if > >>>>>>>>>>> I can!) > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Adam > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23 March 2015 at 13:03, Andrew Case > >>>>>>>>>>> &lt;atcuno(a)gmail.com > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>>> >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are you using the latest git checkout of > >>>>>>>>>>> Volatility or the 2.4 release? Can you try the > >>>>>>>>>>> latest checkout and re-run Volatility strings > >>>>>>>>>>> (you can run it on just the offsets from PID > >>>>>>>>>>> 123 to make it faster). > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you are already on the latest checkout then > >>>>>>>>>>> we will need to debug further. > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Andrew (@attrc) > >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/23/2015 04:38 AM, Bridgey theGeek > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: Thanks Andrew: > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> python vol.py --profile=WinXPSP2x86 -f > >>>>>>>>>>>> memory.dmp volshell -p 123 Volatility > >>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation Volatility Framework 2.4 Current > >>>>>>>>>>>> context: myapp.exe @ 0x822042f8, pid=123, > >>>>>>>>>>>> ppid=392 > >>>>>>>>>>> DTB=0x76c0040 > >>>>>>>>>>>> Welcome to volshell! Current memory image > >>>>>>>>>>>> is: file:///home/memory.dmp To get help, type > >>>>>>>>>>>> 'hh()' > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> db(0x75b6b4d8) > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0x75b6b4d8 c3 7c 15 c7 85 00 ff ff ff 01 00 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 00 00 75 09 8d .|...........u.. 0x75b6b4e8 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 85 0c ff ff ff 50 ff 17 39 9d 00 ff ff ff 89 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 85 .....P..9....... 0x75b6b4f8 30 ff ff ff > >>>>>>>>>>>> 74 12 6a 0c 8d 85 c4 fe ff ff 50 6a > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0...t.j.......Pj 0x75b6b508 07 6a fe e8 ea 92 > >>>>>>>>>>>> ff ff 83 bd 28 ff ff ff 0c 0f > >>>>>>>>>>>> .j........(..... 0x75b6b518 84 8c 59 00 00 e9 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 18 ff ff ff 90 90 47 00 6c 00 > >>>>>>>>>>>> ..Y.........G.l. 0x75b6b528 6f 00 62 00 61 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 00 6c 00 5c 00 54 00 65 00 72 00 > >>>>>>>>>>>> o.b.a.l.\.T.e.r. 0x75b6b538 6d 00 53 00 72 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 00 76 00 52 00 65 00 61 00 64 00 > >>>>>>>>>>>> m.S.r.v.R.e.a.d. 0x75b6b548 79 00 45 00 76 > >>>>>>>>>>>> 00 65 00 6e 00 74 00 00 00 90 90 > >>>>>>>>>>>> y.E.v.e.n.t..... > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, still no banner. But it is identical to > >>>>>>>>>>>> what I find at > >>>>>>>>>>> 0x1a34d8 in > >>>>>>>>>>>> 123.dmp. (As you'd expect.) Double-checked > >>>>>>>>>>>> that I was searching Unicode and ASCII - > >>>>>>>>>>>> still no luck. > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm. > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Adam > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 23 March 2015 at 04:02, Andrew Case > >>>>>>>>>>>> &lt;atcuno(a)gmail.com > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com> > >>>>>> <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com <mailto:atcuno@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can do you: > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> vol.py ... volshell -p 123 > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Then in volshell do: > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> db(0x75b6b4d8) > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And see if you get the banner printed at the > >>>>>>>>>>>> beginning? > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, how are you searching 123.dmp? Did you > >>>>>>>>>>>> search ascii & > >>>>>>>>>>> unicode > >>>>>>>>>>>> (most common error) > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Andrew (@attrc) > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/20/2015 03:59 PM, Bridgey theGeek > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't quite see what's wrong with my > >>>>>>>>>>>>> logic here, but I must be > >>>>>>>>>>>> missing > >>>>>>>>>>>>> something. Hoping someone can help me out. > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking for a private key in a memory > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sample (WinXPSP2x86). Specifically, to find > >>>>>>>>>>>>> out which process/es is/are accessing it. > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can find the key by searching the raw > >>>>>>>>>>>>> memory dump > >>>>>>>>>>> (memory.dmp). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> As you might expect it's between: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- -----END > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RSA PRIVATE KEY----- > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I generated an offset:string file by using > >>>>>>>>>>>>> strings. Then, using the strings plugin I > >>>>>>>>>>>>> get this output: $ python vol.py -f > >>>>>>>>>>>>> memory.dmp --profile=WinXPSP2x86 strings > >>>>>>>>>>> -s pk.txt > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Volatility Foundation Volatility Framework > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4 188435934 [FREE MEMORY:-1] -----BEGIN > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RSA PRIVATE KEY----- 188435968 [FREE > >>>>>>>>>>>>> MEMORY:-1] -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY----- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 317375704 [kernel:d2ab24d8] -----BEGIN RSA > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PRIVATE KEY----- 317376575 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [kernel:d2ab283f] -----END RSA PRIVATE > >>>>>>>>>>>>> KEY----- 417203416 [123:75b6b4d8] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- 417204287 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [123:75b6b83f] -----END RSA PRIVATE > >>>>>>>>>>>>> KEY----- 419888606 [FREE MEMORY:-1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- 419888640 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [FREE MEMORY:-1] -----END RSA PRIVATE > >>>>>>>>>>>>> KEY----- > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lovely. So I now do a memdump of process > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 123: $ python vol.py -f memory.dmp > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --profile=WinXPSP2x86 memdump > >>>>>>>>>>> --pid=123 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --dump-dir=123 Volatility Foundation > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Volatility Framework 2.4 > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ***************************************************************** > *** > > > >>>> * > >> > * > >>>> ** > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Writing myapp.exe [ 123] to 123.dmp > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> However, if I search 123.dmp neither the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BEGIN or END > >>>>>>>>>>> strings are > >>>>>>>>>>>> present. > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So I thought I'd try and find it via the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual address give, > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0x75b6b4d8: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> $ python vol.py -f memory.dmp > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --profile=WinXPSP2x86 memmap > >>>>>>>>>>> --pid=123 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Virtual Physical Size > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DumpFileOffset ---------- ---------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- -------------- --SNIP-- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0x75b6b000 0x18de0000 0x1000 0x1a3000 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --SNIP-- > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The text is indeed at 0x18de04d8 in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> memory.dmp, but not at > >>>>>>>>>>> 0x1a34d8 in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 123.dmp. Again, it's no where to be found > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in 123.dmp. > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions..?? > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks, Adam > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Vol-users mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-user > s > >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>> Vol-users mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>> Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org>> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ Vol-users > >>>>>>>> mailing list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ Vol-users > >>>>>>>> mailing list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > >>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Vol-users mailing list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Vol-users > >>>>>> mailing list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Vol-users mailing > >>>>> list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>>> <mailto:Vol-users@volatilityfoundation.org> > >>>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > >> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ Vol-users mailing > >>>> list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > >>>> http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > > _______________________________________________ Vol-users mailing > > list Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org > > http://lists.volatilityfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/vol-users > > >

Hey Greg, Just add a "0x" in front of your number so python know it is a hex value. Otherwise, it will try to treat it as a variable name. Let us know if that fixes your issue. Thanks, Andrew (@attrc) On 05/15/2015 10:05 AM, Gregory Pendergast wrote: