I am aware of the tech preview tools (that I learned about sitting in
scudette's class no less!) but I haven't had enough "stick time" with
them to trust a remote user running a dump for me with them.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:47 PM, alex pease <alex.pease(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://volatility.googlecode.com/files/volatility-3.0-tp2.zip
Not that I am saying use a different imager.
I know scudette didn't write that all you need to do is run his tool. If I
remember write it is winpmem.exe -o file.mem, and you have a raw memory
dump.
Dumpit likes to deadlock systems.
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012, Dewhirst, Rob wrote:
>
> I know I have the right profile but hearing something like this makes
> me question the image. I took a new image with a different tool and
> can now dump the process without error.
>
> FWIW I used Dumpit for the first image and FTK Imager for the second.
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Michael Cohen <scudette(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Rob,
> > According to the psscan output you posted the PDB (Process directory
> > base) is 0xcf3392c0. This is clearly an invalid address since a DTB is
> > always aligned on page boundaries.
> >
> > Can you dump other processes from this image? Is it possible that you
> > dont have the correct profile chosen for your image?
> >
> > Michael.
> >
> > On 30 October 2012 17:07, Dewhirst, Rob <robdewhirst(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The process doesn't appear to have exited based on pslist (and it was
> >> still generating network traffic while I dumped ram)
> >>
> >> Offset(V) Name PID PPID Thds Hnds Sess
> >> Wow64 Start Exit
> >> ---------- -------------------- ------ ------ ------ -------- ------
> >> ------ -------------------- --------------------
> >> 0x8b3802a8 System 4 0 127 -------- ------
> >> 0
> >> 0x89be3290 smss.exe 312 4 2 -------- ------
> >> 0 2012-10-26 02:29:26
> >> [...]
> >> 0x89b1e020 redactedxx.e 1684 432 15 -------- ------
> >> 0 2012-10-26 02:29:39
> >>
> >> Don't know if this helps
> >>
> >> psxview
> >>
> >> Volatile Systems Volatility Framework 2.2
> >> Offset(P) Name PID pslist psscan thrdproc pspcdid
> >> csrss
> >> ---------- -------------------- ------ ------ ------ -------- -------
> >> -----
> >> 0x09b17b70 svchost.exe 2632 True True False False
> >> False
> >> [...]
> >> 0x09b1e020 redactedxx.e 1684 True True False False
> >> False
> >>
> >> psscan
> >>
> >> sansforensics@SIFT-Workstation:~/Desktop$ vol.py -f
> >> ~/Desktop/image.raw --profile Win2003SP2x86 psscan
> >> Volatile Systems Volatility Framework 2.2
> >> Offset(P) Name PID PPID PDB Time created
> >> Time exited
> >> ---------- ---------------- ------ ------ ----------
> >> -------------------- --------------------
> >> 0x09b1e020 redactedxx.e 1684 432 0xcf3392c0 2012-10-26 02:29:39
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Michael Hale Ligh
> >> <michael.hale(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> This means that the DTB (page directory) for the process doesn't
> >>> appear
> >>> valid, which is typically because the process has exited (although the
> >>> _EPROCESS structure itself may still exist, its page tables can be
> >>> corrupt).
> >>> Can you check the exit time for this process with pslist or psscan?
> >>>
> >>> MHL
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dewhirst, Rob
<robdewhirst(a)gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Have never seen this error when trying to dump a process. Any
> >>>> suggestions? tried -u as well with the same results.
> >>>>
> >>>> vol.exe -f image.raw --profile Win2003SP2x86 procexedump -D dump/
-p
> >>>> 1684
> >>>> Volatile Systems Volatility Framework 2.2
> >>>> Process(V) ImageBase Name Result
> >>>> ---------- ---------- -------------------- ------
> >>>> 0x89b1e020 ---------- redactedxxxxx.e Error: Cannot acquire
> >>>> process
> >>>> AS
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Vol-users mailing list
> >>>> Vol-users(a)volatilityfoundation.org